Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn RSS
    Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn RSS
    SHOOTonline SHOOTonline SHOOTonline
    Register
    • Home
    • News
      • MySHOOT
      • Articles | Series
        • Best work
        • Chat Room
        • Director Profiles
        • Features
        • News Briefs
        • “The Road To Emmy”
        • “The Road To Oscar”
        • Top Spot
        • Top Ten Music Charts
        • Top Ten VFX Charts
      • Columns | Departments
        • Earwitness
        • Hot Locations
        • Legalease
        • People on the Move
        • POV (Perspective)
        • Rep Reports
        • Short Takes
        • Spot.com.mentary
        • Street Talk
        • Tool Box
        • Flashback
      • Screenwork
        • MySHOOT
        • Most Recent
        • Featured
        • Top Spot of the Week
        • Best Work You May Never See
        • New Directors Showcase
      • SPW Publicity News
        • SPW Release
        • SPW Videos
        • SPW Categories
        • Event Calendar
        • About SPW
      • Subscribe
    • Screenwork
      • Attend NDS2024
      • MySHOOT
      • Most Recent
      • Most Viewed
      • New Directors Showcase
      • Best work
      • Top spots
    • Trending
    • NDS2024
      • NDS Web Reel & Honorees
      • Become NDS Sponsor
      • ENTER WORK
      • ATTEND
    • PROMOTE
      • ADVERTISE
        • ALL AD OPTIONS
        • SITE BANNERS
        • NEWSLETTERS
        • MAGAZINE
        • CUSTOM E-BLASTS
      • FYC
        • ACADEMY | GUILDS
        • EMMY SEASON
        • CUSTOM E-BLASTS
      • NDS SPONSORSHIP
    • Contact
    • Subscribe
      • Digital ePubs Only
      • PDF Back Issues
      • Log In
      • Register
    SHOOTonline SHOOTonline SHOOTonline
    Home » The Method Behind Oscar Madness

    The Method Behind Oscar Madness

    By SHOOT StaffThursday, February 27, 2014Updated:Tuesday, May 14, 2024No Comments2306 Views
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Telegram Pinterest Tumblr Reddit WhatsApp Email
    • Image

    Oscars: How we ended up with 9 best picture noms

    By Ryan Nakashima, Business Writer

    LOS ANGELES (AP) --
    Was it Lee Daniels' "The Butler," the folk rock bio pic "Inside Llewyn Davis," or Woody Allen's "Blue Jasmine"?
     
    We'll never know which film might have been the 10th best picture nominee at this year's Oscars.
     
    Ahead of Hollywood's biggest night on Sunday, moviegoers may wonder why there have been only nine nominees for best picture the last three years — even though the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences' rules allow for up to 10.
     
    It's all part of a magic, complicated formula intended to choose the year's best films, introduce an element of surprise, and minimize voters' incentive to vote strategically, according to Rick Rosas, a PricewaterhouseCoopers partner who supervises the count.
     
    It allows for fewer nominees in years when support is weak for certain films. Movies that make the cut need a hard-core group of supporters as well as broad acceptance by voters who would rank it their second- or third-best choice of the year.
     
    "We want voters to be able to fully vote their conscience," Rosas says, "not to worry, 'My vote won't matter for a particular film.'"
     
    Here's how the best-picture nomination process works. But we must also issue a spoiler alert: Stop reading now if you would rather not spoil the fun of the Oscars by trying to figure out one of the most complicated formulas devised by man.
     
    Still with us? Good luck.
     
    The Academy's 6,000 members are sent ballots and asked to rank their five favorite films of the year.
     
    Let's say "Voter Jane" really loved "12 Years a Slave" but also thought "American Hustle," ''Philomena," ''Gravity," and "Nebraska" deserved runner-up status. She'd mark her ballot ranking "12 Years" as No. 1, "American Hustle" No. 2 and so on.
     
    Here's where the ballot counters come in.
     
    All the films are ranked according to how many first-place votes they received.
     
    Any that get over 9.1 percent of the first-place votes are automatically nominated. That ensures that no more than 10 nominees automatically make the cut. If 10 make it, then the counting is done.
     
    If there are fewer than 10, the ballot counters look for so-called surplus votes. Any film that receives votes at least 10 percent above the 9.1-percent automatic nomination threshold will have the surplus votes re-allocated according to the voter's second choice — or third choice if the second choice is already nominated.
     
    Each first-place vote for that popular film is given a lesser weight so the film barely crosses the threshold, and that ballot's second-place votes help another film, to a lesser degree.
     
    So if "12 Years a Slave" received 10 percent of the votes, all of its first-place votes are counted with a weight of roughly 0.9 votes, and all of the second-place votes on the same ballot are redistributed to those films (like "American Hustle") with a weight of roughly 0.1 votes.
     
    Another check is done to see if any films cross the 9.1 percent threshold.
     
    Next, films with less than 1 percent of the first-place votes are eliminated and those ballots are reallocated according to the voter's second choice — or third choice if the second is already nominated.
     
    Finally, all films with more than 5 percent of the votes are automatically nominated. If there are between five and 10, the counting is done. If there are more than 10, the films with the fewest votes are eliminated and their next-choice votes are redistributed until only 10 remain. If there are less than five, the counters start over and eliminate from the least vote-getters up, while redistributing voters' next-choice votes until only five remain.
     
    So those second- and third-place choices really matter, even if a voter's first-place selection is extremely popular.
     
    Still with us? The actual balloting for best picture — completed this past Tuesday — is far less complicated:
     
    All voters are again asked to rank the nominees in order of preference — this year, that means from 1 to 9.
     
    If any film gets 50 percent of the first-place votes plus one, it wins. If not, the films with the fewest first-place are eliminated and those ballots are redistributed according to the voter's second-, third- and fourth-place choices accordingly.
     
    Either way, a film needs a lot of first-place votes from passionate backers, and a healthy standing as a second- and third-place pick in order to win.
     
    But as you can see, it really is an honor just to be nominated.
    REGISTRATION REQUIRED to access this page.

    Already registered? LOGIN
    Don't have an account? REGISTER

    Registration is FREE and FAST for UNLIMITED ACCESS to all SHOOT pages using either your email or social login (LinkedIn, Facebook, Google or X)

    The limited access duration has come to an end. (Access was allowed until: 2014-03-01)
    Category:News
    Tags:Academy AwardsAcademy of Motion Picture Arts and SciencesOscars



    SHOOT’s 65th Anniversary Reflections: FKKS’ Managing Partner Jeffrey A. Greenbaum

    Thursday, July 17, 2025

    As SHOOT celebrates a milestone, its 65th year of publication, we continue a recently launched series of interviews and features that will run throughout the summer on SHOOTonline and in SHOOT‘s newsletters and special PDF Issue with digital distribution in which industry executives, creatives and artists reflect on the changes they’ve seen over the decades, as well as essential dynamics that have endured. These folks--from different sectors of the business--will also share their visions and aspirations for the future. Perhaps most importantly, this special SHOOT coverage enables us to look back on the industry’s history, learn from it, and plum relevant lessons that will help us now and beyond. Mark Twain once famously said, “History doesn’t repeat itself but it often rhymes.” Twain’s insight underscores the importance of the past and its role in helping us better shape today and tomorrow. Such perspectives are invaluable yet sadly often not properly considered as society’s tendency at times is to overlook history and its significance. Additionally, the new generation navigating our industry sometimes isn’t aware of the relevant history, having not experienced it firsthand. Hopefully helping to close those gaps will be SHOOT’s 65th Anniversary coverage which seeks to provide historical context and to benefit from its relevance to the present and what may lie ahead. This week we connect with preeminent advertising industry lawyer Jeffrey A. Greenbaum, managing partner at Frankfurt Kurnit Klein + Selz (FKKS), to gain context on where we’ve been, where we are, and where we’re going. SHOOT reaching out to Greenbaum for his legal expertise is nothing new. Greenbaum has been a regular panelist... Read More

    No More Posts Found

    MySHOOT Profiles

    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Telegram Pinterest Tumblr Reddit WhatsApp Email

    Previous ArticleStreet Talk for February 28, 2014
    Next Article Gregg Allman Biopic Shelved After Tragic Train Crash
    SHOOT Staff

    Add A Comment
    What's Hot

    What to Stream: Dragons, Donkey Kong, Pac-Man, Myke Towers and ‘The Summer I Turned Pretty’

    Thursday, July 17, 2025

    SHOOT’s 65th Anniversary Reflections: FKKS’ Managing Partner Jeffrey A. Greenbaum

    Thursday, July 17, 2025

    Two Viewership Milestones Underscore The Changing Media Landscape

    Wednesday, July 16, 2025
    Shoot Screenwork

    Top Spot of the Week: BIEN’s Animated Prequel To The Documentary “Quad Life”

    Wednesday, July 16, 2025

    For Quad Life–a short live-action documentary it developed about sound designer David Jeffers’ life after…

    Monster Hunters Wanted! Director Zac Ella, Ad Agency CALLEN Team On High-Chaos Recruitment Campaign For Supercell’s mo.co Game

    Tuesday, July 15, 2025

    The Best Work You May Never See: Director Martin Werner and Courage Team On A Finger Lickin’ Good KFC Canada Spot–With An Apology To Table Manners

    Monday, July 14, 2025

    Daisy Ifama Directs Google Film On Emergency Obstetric Care In Nigeria

    Friday, July 11, 2025

    The Trusted Source For News, Information, Industry Trends, New ScreenWork, and The People Behind the Work in Film, TV, Commercial, Entertainment Production & Post Since 1960.

    Today's Date: Fri May 26 2023
    Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn RSS
    More Info
    • Overview
    • Upcoming in SHOOT Magazine
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Policy
    • SHOOT Copyright Notice
    • SPW Copyright Notice
    • Spam Policy
    • Terms of Service (TOS)
    • FAQ
    STAY CURRENT

    SUBSCRIBE TO SHOOT EPUBS

    © 1990-2021 DCA Business Media LLC. All rights reserved. SHOOT and SHOOTonline are registered trademarks of DCA Business Media LLC.
    • Home
    • Trending Now

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.